July 3, 2015 3 pm in Alberta, 2 pm Pacific Time: Ian Jessop to interview Jessica Ernst on Supreme Court of Canada Rejecting AER Argument to Dismiss her Frac Lawsuit and Refuse her Constitutional Question

Supreme Court of Canada Docket on Ernst vs AER:

2015-06-30: Appeal hearing tentative date: January 12, 2016

On the Constitutional Question:

Where an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada raises a constitutional question (as in the Ernst vs AER lawsuit), the appellant is required to bring a Motion to State a Constitutional Question. It’s the court’s preference that constitutional questions be stated on a consent basis.

Ernst’s lawyers asked Glenn Solomon, counsel for the AER, if the regulator consented to the above questions. This was Solomon’s response:

“We will not be able to agree on a Constitutional Question, and you will have to bring an Application in that regard.”

2013 10 09 screen capture Canadian Charter of Rights and FreedomsIan Jessop

CFAX Radio

cfax1070 logo

Victoria, BC

On-air Talk Shows:
Phone: 250.386.1161
Email: email hidden; JavaScript is required

This entry was posted in Case News, Global Frac News. Bookmark the permalink.