Mountie broke the law when he investigated protester’s background, says watchdog report by Catharine Tunney, June 9, 2019, CBC News
A British Columbia Mountie broke the law when he started snooping into a protester’s background and leaked information to municipal officials — but it took an outside investigation to convince RCMP brass to see it that way.
The incident dates back to the fall of 2015, when a complaint came forward alleging that an officer accessed police databases and disclosed background information to senior municipal officials after a rowdy council meeting, according to a report by the RCMP’s independent watchdog obtained through access to information law.
The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission report is heavily redacted; it doesn’t even disclose the name of the municipality. However, it describes how the RCMP got involved after the person who filed the complaint with the CRCC — a boisterous protester — held up a sign at a municipal meeting that read “Pinko Commie.”
The report says the municipality was concerned about the protester escalating his efforts. According to emails obtained by the commission, RCMP Insp. Al O’Donnell used PRIME — an electronic record management system used by police in British Columbia — and other databases to find out if the protester had any past run-ins with police.
The protester’s record was clean, according to the report. The RCMP relayed that news to the municipality.
The RCMP investigated the protester’s original complaint and found its members acted “reasonably,” according to a report from the force’s independent watchdog. They defended the background search, saying it was conducted in the public’s interest.
[The RCMP investigates themselves breaking the law, and finds their law violations were in the public interest? Is that the RCMP’s excuse for trespassing on Ernst’s property, wanting access to her home and to interrogate her — without a warrant, after she served legal papers on AER, Alberta Environment and Encana (for breaking the law and violating her rights)?]
The CRCC disagreed.
“The commission found that Inspector O’Donnell did unreasonably disclose [redacted] personal information … contrary to law and policy,” says their final report. “Superintendent [Mark] Fisher unreasonably authorized the disclosure.”
RCMP commissioner agrees with finding
The Privacy Act prohibits the disclosure of personal information by government institutions, except in limited circumstances.
The CRCC ruled that telling the municipal government about the protester’s background violated the law, even though the RCMP found no records of past official contact with police.
“There is no suggestion that [redacted] had breached municipal bylaw. The record merely demonstrates that [redacted] held up signs critical of municipal council,” says the report.
Late last year, RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki sent a letter to the commission agreeing with their findings and recommendations.
The RCMP says all detachment members were informed of the restrictions on the disclosure of personal information under RCMP E Division policy and the Privacy Act.
[What difference will that make? The RCMP trespassing on Ernst’s property knew they were breaking the law – one of the constables apologized six times as the two men completed their failed attempt to intimidate Ernst into dropping her lawsuit and sheepishly left]
Following the commission’s recommendation, the RCMP says the new officer in charge of the B.C. detachment makes sure all employees comply with the Privacy Act and internal policies regarding personal information.
The commission’s other recommendation was completely redacted.
The RCMP says O’Donnell has retired and Fisher has taken another posting.
Neither could be reached for comment.
Refer also to:
2019 06 08: Who orders a new hearing for a Supreme Court of Canada ruling where 9 justices knowingly published a lie and sent it to the media? Who “slaps” Justice Rosalie Abella for knowingly lying in her ruling and belittling the applicant? Certainly not the Canadian Judicial Council!
2017 01 25: Jessica Ernst Open Letter to Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin Regarding False and Seriously Damaging Statements in Justice Rosalie Abella’s Supreme Court of Canada Ruling, Ernst v AER
2009 02 09: The Intimidation of Ernst: Members of Harper Government’s Anti-terrorist Squad Intimidate and Harass Ernst after her Legal Papers were Served on Encana, the EUB (now AER) and Alberta Environment
Dennis De Franceschi on the left, was the lead interrogator of Ernst. The fellow on the right afterwards apologized, repeatedly. Both trespassed on Ernst’s property. On whose orders? Encana? Steve Harper when he was PM? The AER? The Alberta Government?
During the interrogation, Ernst asked the officers to investigate Encana breaking the law, frac’ing Rosebud’s drinking water aquifers, and the cover-up and law violations by Alberta Environment and AER. The officers said nothing and failed to do their jobs, failed to serve Canadians, failed to protect the public interest.
The RCMP refuse to fulfill their responsibilities when asked to investigate law violations by polluting oil and gas companies, and subsequent law violations by regulators covering-up the law violations. And Canada’s Supreme Court judges piss on justice and the Rule of Law, and trample on the Charter of Rights and Freedoms by knowingly publishing a dishonest ruling and lying to the media.