Front Page: Politely spurn fracking, mom Diana Daunheimer urges Yukoners by Ainslie Cruickshank, February 14, 2014, Whitehorse Star
Fracking: ‘Don’t make a hasty decision’ by Ainslie Cruickshank, February 14, 2014, Whitehorse Star
“Give it another 10 years … there’s a huge surplus in the system right now, so just sit on it for a little while, just sit and wait and see where we are impact-wise in another 10 years.”
Diana Daunheimer, an organic farmer and a mother of two, lives just west of Didsbury, Alta. on an 11-acre parcel of land.
There are six shale gas wells surrounding her property, not more than 500 metres away. The first one was drilled in 2008, the last one just last year.
Her 10-year-old daughter was diagnosed with a benign but locally invasive tumor in her neck, when she was seven, and her six-year-old son suffers from chronic respiratory difficulties.
And now she’s warning Yukoners: “Don’t make a hasty decision.”
Daunheimer met with the Select Committee Regarding the Risks and Benefits of Hydraulic Fracturing during its fact-finding missing to Alberta last month.
She shared her experience living in close proximity to hydraulic fracturing wells, and offered the same cautions she’s giving to all Yukoners now.
“Wait and see the fallout from what’s happening in the United States and what’s going to happen south of you folks, and then if you still feel it’s an economically wise decision, then look at it,” she said.
Daunheimer can speak freely about her experience because none of the energy projects are on her property so she’s not subject to a non-disclosure agreement.
Earlier this week, she shared some of the most significant impacts her family has dealt with, things like poor air quality, contamination of water wells, light pollution, traffic and surface contamination.
In 2010, a sour crude well was drilled 300 metres south of her home.
The company did what’s called a propane fracture, she said, which uses a propane gel rather than a water based fracture fluid. The company then did a well test and flaring that lasted for 19 days. That well continued to vent sour gas for three years, unbeknownst to the family.
It wasn’t long after the construction of the sour crude well that Daunheimer’s daughter developed the tumor in her neck.
The family didn’t know about the level of carcinogenic material they were being exposed to, so it wasn’t considered during her diagnosis.
Now that she knows, however, Daunheimer has made appointments with a pediatric toxicologist for both her children, and has a few doctors lined up who are willing to review her daughter’s case. “But the medical community is very reluctant to draw those lines,” Daunheimer said.
“Sulfur dioxide is known to cause the type of respiratory difficulties that we’ve been having, irritation, lots of sinus irritation, longstanding sinus colds … when you look at the health data sheets of the substances that they’re using, the lights go off,” she said.
Her family was healthy, they’re organic farmers, they didn’t have health issues and then they popped up at the same time the industry did, Daunheimer noted.
In an open letter to Yukoners, she cautions against the myth that strong regulations can safeguard the territory.
“Alberta states with confidence that they have ‘world-class’ regulations, yet I have mountains of files that show each and every well near our home was non-compliant on several levels,” she writes.
Daunheimer told the Star she made her concerns known to the company about the air quality after the sour crude well went in. Those concerns were never validated or recorded, which is “highly non-compliant,” she said.
And when she approached the Alberta regulator? She said she was treated like a “criminal” for reporting the company.
When the Alberta Energy Regulator eventually began an investigation and did an audit on the well, the company was given a non-compliance because the family wasn’t notified of the continued venting. “They made them remove the venting tank and tie in that well so that those gases were mitigated and no longer venting,” Daunheimer said. “Each and every time a well comes in, you’re inundated with diesel fumes, you’re inundated with fugitive emissions, from the drilling process, the flaring process,” she said.
Most of the wells near Daunheimer’s home were previously owned by Angle Energy Inc., but the company has since been bought out by Bellatrix Corp.
Daunheimer explained that because the company refused to engage with them about their concerns and they had difficulties dealing with the regulator as well, they decided their only option was to go to the courts.
“We feel so disappointed with the regulatory structure and culture that we feel we have no recourse but to circumvent their lack of protection and litigate against the company responsible for violating our fundamental rights of personal security and enjoyment of property,” she writes in her open letter.
“The only way to protect your family and land in the face of oil and gas exploration is to say NO! Insist your government find alternative methods of revenue generation and pursue renewable energy options that are not going to destroy the pristine ecosystem you currently enjoy,” she says.
Daunheimer sent her letter to the select committee last week. It has not yet been posted on the committee’s website.
The all-party committee was formed last May to gain a scientific understanding of the controversial practice and to make recommendations to the government about whether it should permit the practice for shale gas development in the territory.
Testimony from experts and comments from the public are available on the committee’s website at http://www.legassembly.gov.yk.ca/rbhf.html
[Refer also to:
Diana’s name is finally added today, February 14, 2014 (likely because of this Front Page news coverage) to the Yukon Select Committee’s website along with two of the four citizens who presented to the Committee on January 6, 2014 during their Fact Finding Tour in Alberta. Kimberly Mildenstein also presented that evening, her name remains censored.
According to the Alberta Energy Regulator Why isn’t the AER doing its job of protecting the public? Or is the AER like everyone else in government only here to protect the oil industry?
Prior to the Committee visiting Alberta, Yukoners Concerned publicly exposed the pro-fracking bias planned. With extremely short notice, Jessica Ernst was asked to arrange an informal meeting with a few harmed Albertans and one or two committee members. As it turns out, likely because of the bad publicity, all members attended. Two of the harmed who presented were Diana Daunheimer (Google: ernst encana daunheimers. Google:hydraulic fracking challenged 2013) and Kimberly Mildenstein (Google: ernst encana mildenstein eagle hill. Google: fracking canada no duty of care). Both are mothers. They traveled on their own time and costs; Diana with her children because her husband was away. Their names are not listed on the Committee website even though both advised that their names could be made public with Rob Schwartz and the Campbells, and their contact information given to the media. It is unconscionable that the Committee is censoring two Alberta mothers harmed by fracking! Peer-reviewed studies warn of the health risks from fracking (Google: the endocrine disruption exchange mr gowen. Google: human health unconventional natural gas resources) and it appears that these are unfolding as warned.