Subject: Lacombe County won’t fund group that links energy companies with rural residents
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:54:24 -0700
The Lacombe County certainly were right in refusing any help to the Synergy group!! In the Sundre area SPOG the Sundre group– actually took over many of the industry regulator duties— and became a complete nuisance when Shell Canada had a very dangerous H2S leak!! This was the worst handled H2S incident in Alberta history and became know as the Caroline Cover Up—because of information to the press that citizens knew very well was not the truth!! School children were hauled from clean area’s into Caroline while it was under a cloud of H2S simply because Shells telephone system haemorrhaged and that was deemed to be a secret by both the regulator and the SPOG synergy group!!
The basic idea of synergy moves the energy Companies another tier away from the landowners they are affecting—a great thing for the industry members—but sometime very frustrating for land owners!! The pertinent health issues a land owner thinks he is sharing solely with a company and not to be shared with anyone– soon becomes neighbourhood information as it is passed on to SPOG in the Caroline Sundre area!! The Alberta Energy Regulator did have a part called “Other Important Initiatives” that was used to finance these industry —would be –regulators!! I didn’t find the first of these synergy groups moving both the regulator and the industry another step removed from the land owners they affect as a positive step at all!!
Lacombe County won’t fund group that links energy companies with rural residents, Group offers link between energy industry and residents by Paul Cowley, Nov 12, 2019, Red Deer Advocate
Lacombe County has rejected a request to help fund a group that provides a link between the energy industry and rural residents.
The county received a request to provide $1,000 towards Central Alberta Synergy’s operating budget. Other municipalities will be asked to provide the same amount.
Oil and gas companies will be charged $2,500, and service companies $1,500. [Mighty cheap to get a group to propagandize and lie for industry and spy on concerned citizens asking questions that the AER and industry don’t want to answer]
Lacombe County council debated the request last Thursday and voted 6-1 to turn it down. Coun. Keith Stephenson was the only one in favour.
Central Alberta Synergy says on its Facebook page that the group was formed in the fall of 2018 in response to increased oil and gas activity in central Alberta. It is one of a network of similar groups across the province that are governed by Synergy Alberta.
Lacombe, Red Deer and Ponoka counties, City of Red Deer and Town of Bentley are part of Central Alberta Synergy, along with the Alberta Energy Regulator and area landowners.
Stephenson argued the group is a useful link between county residents and the energy industry.
“I’d hate to lose this over $1,000,” he said.
However, Coun. Barb Shepherd countered that the main beneficiaries of synergy groups is industry, which can use them to keep residents informed [not informed, lied to] about what is going on around them.
Funding the group this year could set a precedent for future requests, she said.
Coun. Ken Wigmore shared a similar concern.
“It’s expected if you support once, you’re going to be expected to support it every year,” he said.
While the group is useful, the county should not be expected to support it financially, said Coun. Brenda Knight.
“The venue is working, but I still think it should be funded by the oil companies.”
CAPP & AER too cheap to finance industry’s hench groups anymore?
The group meets monthly and typically includes presentations on issues affecting area residents. A recent meeting included a talk from a Farmers Advocate Office of Alberta representative.
Refer also to:
“The research is in: Stop fracking ASAP.” And, stop asking for regulations, responsible energy development, more study and fake, industry-controlled reviews. Asking for such enables more abuses. Time to say, “No, we are opposed!”
A July 28, 2019 email from Ernst to industry harmed Albertans asking for responsible energy development:
Good morning Gentlemen,
It appears you are not understanding how successfully synergy brainwashes people into running around in circles creating group after group after group, doing the same thing over and over and over, asking for money and “responsible energy development,” while publicly chanting, “we are not anti-oil” and or “we are not opposed.”
Such chanting gives consent. It gives industry and AER [Alberta Energy Regulator] (which is industry) their badly needed social license to operate, laughing all the way into intentional receivership with heaps of money in the secret bank, leaving the raped to clean up and hung with industry’s legal liabilities. This cartoon from the 2007 report by Justice D. W. Perras sums it up:
[EUB was ERCB, became ERCB again, after Ernst’s lawsuit went public, became AER]
I added the cartoon to this post yesterday.
Communities confidently saying, “No, we are opposed!” stops industry’s social license to gang rape dead in its tracks. I’ve seen it time and time again.
There is no such thing as “responsible energy development.” Thankfully oil-soaked pioneers like Alberta, Texas, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, Ohio, Colorado etc – are perfect examples of the rampant industry contamination, corruption and cover-ups, as well as the uselessness and irrelevance of numerous synergized groups and residents running around chasing their tails, while they continue to be abused and pounded to dust. This certainly serves other world communities well when they stand up with their seriously engaged and responsible governments to protect their citizens and communities – and ban this shit.
The research is in: Stop fracking ASAP by Barbara Gottlieb, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Aug. 1, 2019, Caller Times, Part of the US Today Network
Science. Evidence. Facts. Do these even matter anymore in U.S. policy? They should — especially when it comes to issues that affect our health and environment, like fracking.
Concerned Health Professionals of New York and my organization, Physicians for Social Responsibility, recently released a remarkable compendium of research on the subject. It summarizes and links to more than 1,500 articles and reports and has become the go-to source for activists, health professionals, and others seeking to understand fracking.
The new studies we looked at expose serious threats to health, justice, and the climate.
A 2018 study in the Journal of Health Economics, for instance, found that the babies of Pennsylvania mothers living within 1.5 miles of gas wells had increased incidence of low birth weight. Babies with low birth weight (under 5.5 pounds) are over 20 times more likely to die in infancy than babies with healthy birth weight.
Babies exposed in utero to fracking are likely to face additional challenges throughout their lives. They may suffer long-term neurologic disability, impaired language development and academic success, and increased risk of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease and diabetes.
Other researchers are finding that fracking wells and associated infrastructure are disproportionately sited in non-white, indigenous, or low-income communities.
A study published this year in Ecological Economics analyzed the socio-demographics of people living near drilling and fracking operations in four high-fracking states: Colorado, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Texas.
It found strong evidence that minorities, especially African Americans, disproportionately live near fracking wells.
They don’t just face disproportionate exposure to toxic emissions, leaks, and spills. They also have fewer resources — like health insurance, medical services, or income security — that would help them protect their health.
But you don’t have to live near wells and pipelines to be at risk. We all face harm from fracking’s impact on the climate.
So-called “natural gas” is 85-95 percent methane, a short-lived but highly potent greenhouse gas. Over its first 20 years in the atmosphere, methane traps about 86 times more heat than carbon dioxide. That 20-year timeframe matters: Scientists tell us that’s about the time we have to slash our greenhouse gas emissions and begin pulling carbon out of the atmosphere.
Unfortunately, as the research we collected finds, methane leakage rates from drilling and fracking operations have “greatly exceed” earlier estimates. A 2018 analysis of methane leaks across the U.S. found leakage rates to be 60 percent higher than reported by the EPA. A 2019 study in southwestern Pennsylvania found some gas emissions to have been underreported by a factor of five.
Overall, how bad is fracking? The Compendium states that “public health risks from unconventional gas and oil extraction are real, the range of adverse environmental impacts wide, and the negative economic consequences considerable.”
It concludes: “Our examination of the peer-reviewed medical, public health, biological, earth sciences, and engineering literature uncovered no evidence that fracking can be practiced in a manner that does not threaten human health.”
The logical conclusion is that, for health, justice, and a livable world, the time to stop using fracked gas is now.
Barbara Gottlieb is the Director for Environment & Health at Physicians for Social Responsibility, www.psr.org. She participated in the pre-publication review of the Compendium. This op-ed was distributed by OtherWords.org.
Refer also to:
2019 06 20: Compendium 6 Released: Review by doctors & scientists of more than 1,700 references conclude frac industry poses threat to air, water, climate and human health
2018 03 14: Compendium 5: ‘The Harms of Fracking’: New Report Details Increased Risks of Asthma, Birth Defects and Cancer. Dr. Sandra Steingraber: “Fracking is the worst thing I’ve ever seen.” Dr. Pouné Saberi: “There is a code of silence….” Workers rarely report injuries or hazards, for fear of losing their jobs.
Anthony Ingraffea, PhD, Dwight C. Baum Professor of Engineering, Cornell University, said,“In 2008, when New York State first declared a moratorium on fracking, only six peer-reviewed papers on the health and environmental impacts had been published. Now there are more than 400, and the vast majority show a clear and present danger.
What’s more, many problems are unfixable by regulations of any kind.
It was a wise governor who said ‘wait’ in 2008. And it is wise to continue to wait.”
Ernst presenting in Lethbridge, Alberta, March 25, 2014